“Put the case that the child grew up, and was married for money. That the mother was still living. That the father was still living. That the mother and father, unknown to one another, were dwelling within so many miles, furlongs, yards if you like, of one another. That the secret was still a secret, except that you had got wind of it. Put that last case to yourself very carefully…For whose sake would you reveal the secret? For the father’s? I think he would not be much the better for the mother. For the mother’s? I think if she had done such a deed she would be safer where she was. For the daughter’s? I think it would hardly serve her to establish her parentage for the information of her husband, and to drag her back to disgrace, after an escape of twenty years, pretty secure to last for life.”
– Charles Dickens
Great Expectations, Chapter 51. Speaking hypothetically in lawyerly language, Mr. Jaggers is actually referring to the parentage of Estella, who as a child was adopted by the wealthy Miss Havisham. Revealing the secret of who her parents are would benefit no one, he tells Pip. Rather it would only bring harm and disgrace to parents and daughter, tarnishing reputations. While Jaggers doesn’t mention them by name, Estella’s mother is Molly, who was tried for murder, and her father is the convict Magwitch. Estella’s parentage is a good example of situational irony.